High-intensity interval training, a type of workout that consists of very brief bouts of very strenuous exercise, has become enormously popular in recent years. A main reason is that although such workouts are draining, they can be both very effective and very short, often lasting only a few minutes.
But people take notably different approaches
to this form of exercise. Some complete only one sustained, all-out,
four- or five- minute bike ride or sprint — a single interval — and then
are done. Others practice standard interval training, involving
repeated brief bursts of almost unbearably taxing exertion, interspersed
with restful minutes of gentler exercise. Some people perform such
sessions two or three times per week; others almost every day.
The science of intensive interval training
has, though, been lagging behind the workout’s popularity. Past studies
of HIIT, as the practice is commonly known, had established that as
measured by changes in cellular markers, standard short-burst HIIT
training may improve aerobic fitness up to 10 times as much as moderate
endurance training. But scientists had not determined whether a single
sustained interval likewise improves fitness, or the ideal number of
HIIT sessions per week.
So to clarify those issues, researchers at
two of the laboratories most noted for HIIT science set out to learn
more about the best way to do interval training.
First, for a study published this month in Experimental Physiology,
scientists at McMaster University in Ontario gathered 17 healthy young
men and women and divided them into groups. Ten of them were asked to
exercise on two separate days. On one day they completed a standard HIIT
session consisting of four 30-second bouts of all-out, tongue-lolling
effort on a stationary bicycle, alternating with four minutes of
recovery between. On another day they completed a single uninterrupted
interval lasting for about four minutes, by which time each rider had
combusted the same amount of energy as during the stop-and-go session.
Before and after the workouts, the scientists gathered blood and muscle
samples.
Separately, the remaining seven volunteers
did the continuous four-minute workout three times a week for six weeks.
The researchers again collected blood and muscle samples, and monitored
changes in the riders’ athletic performance by having them ride as hard
as possible for a specified period of time.
When collated and compared, the data showed
that the physiological differences among the two groups of riders were
notable and, in some ways, strange.
On the one hand, the scientists found no
significant variations in how the muscles of riders in the first group
responded to a single session of interval training, whether of the
standard stop-and-go variety or a sole sustained effort. In both cases,
the riders showed immediate, post-exercise increases in their blood
levels of certain proteins associated with eventual improvements in
endurance capacity.
But when the researchers checked blood and
muscle tissue in the second group of riders after they had completed six
weeks of single-interval training, some of the pending improvements
seemed to have evaporated. These riders’ muscle tissues now had only
average — not augmented — amounts of the chemicals that help cells to
produce more energy, a reliable marker of fitness. This finding was in
stark contrast to the results of earlier work by the same researchers,
in which they found that six weeks of standard short-burst HIIT exercise
resulted in significant, sustained gains in these markers.
The implications of the new study are not
altogether clear, said Martin Gibala, the chairman of the department of
kinesiology at McMaster University and senior author of the study, but
“it would appear,” he said, “that there is something important, even
essential, about the pulsative nature” of on-off HIIT training if you
wish to reap sustained physiological improvements.
In more practical terms, before you riff on
your current workout, check to see whether reliable science supports
your improvisation.
That caution is underscored by the results of the other major new study of interval training, this one published this month in PLOS One
and undertaken at the Norwegian University of Science and Technology
in Trondheim, Norway. In it, scientists asked volunteers to perform a
total of 24 standard HIIT sessions over either three or eight weeks,
meaning that the volunteers exercised either three times per week or
almost every day and sometimes twice on the same day.
At the end of the prescribed time, those who
had completed three HIIT sessions per week had improved their endurance
capacity by almost 11 percent. But those exercising daily displayed no
such improvements and, in some, endurance declined. Only after those
volunteers had quit training altogether did their aerobic capacity creep
upward; after 12 days of rest, their endurance peaked at about 6
percent above what it had been at the start, suggesting, the researchers
believe, that daily high-intensity interval sessions are too frequent
and exhausting. In that situation, fatigue blunts physical adaptations.
The takeaway of both studies is that it is
best, if you wish to perform high-intensity interval training, to stick
to what is well documented as effective: a few sessions per week of 30-
or 60-second intervals so strenuous you moan, followed by a minute or so
of blessed recovery, and a painful repetition or four. Done correctly,
such sessions, in my experience, get you out of the gym quickly and
inspire truly inventive cursing.
No comments:
Post a Comment